Home » cophmmdv » Researchers not thrilled to see their work cited by Trump car mileage

Researchers not thrilled to see their work cited by Trump car mileage

first_img Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Country Email iStock.com/peeterv By Maxine Joselow, E&E NewsAug. 3, 2018 , 1:00 PM Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*) Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwecenter_img Researchers not thrilled to see their work cited by Trump car mileage proposal “It was surprising to me that my work would be cited in a proposal to argue that we should loosen the standards,” Marshall told E&E News.The Trump administration is arguing that freezing fuel economy targets at 2020 levels would have a negligible effect on air pollution. Its proposal says the freeze “would impact the global climate by 3/1000th of one degree Celsius by 2100.”While Marshall’s study wasn’t cited in order to support that conclusion, he nonetheless disagrees with it.“When you look at the kinds of activities that take place under the Clean Air Act—and vehicle emissions standards are one part of that—cleaning up the air produces strong benefits for public health,” he said. “To be arguing we shouldn’t be continuing to clean up the air, that’s just not consistent with the evidence.”Marshall also noted that his study used private patient information. That means it wouldn’t pass muster under EPA’s “secret science” initiative, which would prevent the agency from using scientific studies in crafting new regulations unless the underlying data are made public.Another researcher, who requested anonymity for fear of retaliation by his employer, also expressed surprise that his paper was cited.“This is nuts,” the researcher said. “This contributed to declaring diesel exhaust a carcinogen.”He added, “It’s best that this data not get analyzed by people with political axes to grind. You get really concerned when people with political axes to grind analyze something in order to find what they want to find.”The proposal also cites a review by the Boston-based Health Effects Institute of hundreds of exposure, epidemiology and toxicology studies. The institute found a “sufficient” causal association between traffic-associated air pollution and childhood asthma.Robert O’Keefe, the institute’s vice president, said the proposal accurately cites the nonprofit corporation’s work.“Yes, the proposal cites HEI’s 2010 HEI Review of exposure to traffic related air pollution, which concluded among other things, that the scientific evidence was sufficient to support a causal association between traffic related air pollution and exacerbation of asthma in children,” O’Keefe said in an email.He added, “Since it’s been over 10 years since the last review, HEI has recently brought together a new expert panel [to] review the most recent literature on exposure to traffic related air pollution and health and a large number of new studies, many of which use enhanced exposure metrics. Results are expected in early 2020.”Reprinted from Greenwire with permission from E&E News. Copyright 2018. E&E provides essential news for energy and environment professionals at www.eenews.net Originally published by E&E NewsUniversity of Washington, Seattle, engineering professor Julian Marshall was surprised to find his study cited in President Donald Trump’s administration’s proposal for revised clean car rules.The proposal refers to Marshall’s 2008 study, “Environmental inequality: Air pollution exposures in California’s South Coast Air Basin,” which was published in the journal Atmospheric Environment. Read more…last_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *